iMOL Archives - It was an experiment: Nithyananda
Welcome iMOL Archives



Home 2SubscribeTrigger HappyEthnic ClashForumHistorySocialPoliticsEconomyEducationPlantation WorkersAbout me
Silence is not an option when things are ill done - Lord Alfred Dennings
Search   in  

 Create an AccountMain Home | Submit News | Your Account | Content | Topics | Top 10  

· Home
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Feedback
· Forums
· Private Messages
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Statistics
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 9 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Select Interface Language:

Random Headlines

[ India ]

·US snubs India on Leno skit, says comments satirical, constitutionally protected
·Kanimozhi, 4 others get bail in 2G case, to spend one more night in Tihar Jail
·TN has mistaken Dam 999 for my do*****entary on Mullaperiyar: Sohan Roy
·Raja, 16 others charged; trial from Nov. 11
·MBA hangs herself on cellphone camera
·Rs 6 lakh for a night of dance, booze and sex in Mumbai
·Tamil actor Ravichandran passes away
·Techie murders wife in Noida, puts body in bed box
·Rajinikanth Returns

Sex News: It was an experiment: Nithyananda

Contributed by Anonymous on Saturday, March 13 @ 09:27:26 CST

Religion Mar 13 2010
BANGALORE: Nithyananda has made his third appearance online, and for the first time makes a passing reference to the scandalous video stating "that he was not going to experiment anything that was not accepted by society widely." A self-proclaimed PR guru to whom the Swami has been giving a series of interviews says in the video that "there is nothing illegal in it (video) where two people with their clothes on are present." To this, the Swami nods in agreement.

He goes on to say that no one "was forcing anything on the other" — in other words, the first acceptance of the fact that it was indeed Swami Nithyananda who was in the video.

Nithyananda claims that the ashram was busy concentrating on the spiritual activities that they could not smell the attack coming.Our public relations was a disaster.We are not trained to face attacks, and we never thought of something like this.

After a lot of uncontrollable activities were seen in the ashram (after the scandal broke out), devotees were afraid that something would happen to me.

They were busy securing the ashram while the accusations mounted. The third online appearance of the Swami it seems is an effort to rebuild the lost image of the ashram.ATTACK WAS ORGANISEDWe are a silent group and simple people. We never thought we would ever have an enemy in the disguise of a devotee.

The media should have taken our version too, before reacting on the accusations, instead of taking one sided view.

 As the media is more popular among the public than me, people have believed the accusations made. It was an organised attack, and we never saw the threat approaching.NONE CAME TO HELPNobody came for our help even when we were socially acceptable.Even during that time we did not receive any help.

However, after things have turned against us, even the locals have turned against us. The media just aired one version of the story while none of the devotees were approached by the media. The media gave just one side of the story.POLICE UPDATEThe local Bidadi police continue guarding the ashram where there was no fresh development.The police continued on their stand that the case hadn't been transferred to them as yet.

The ashram has just about 20 inmates remaining. Although Nithyananda claimed that there was a threat to his life, which is why he is still not accessible, Bidadi police said that so far none from the ashram had approached them for security.



Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Religion
· News by sound

Most read story about Religion:
Hindu Temple demolished

Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Very Good


 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

Disclaimer: The views expressed by the authors and comments on this website are the sole responsibility of the writers themselves. The writer will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The accuracy, completeness, honesty, exactitude and factuality of the articles and comments are not guaranteed by iMOL.

If you do not wish any of your writing republished here, please send mail to sound20[at] Allow us one month to remove it. Thanks. Copyright 1998 iMOL

Page Generation: 0.17 Seconds