iMOL Archives - Samples Taken From Sujatha Missing - Doctors
Welcome iMOL Archives

imol

 

 
Home 2SubscribeTrigger HappyEthnic ClashForumHistorySocialPoliticsEconomyEducationPlantation WorkersAbout me
Silence is not an option when things are ill done - Lord Alfred Dennings
Search   in  

 Create an AccountMain Home | Submit News | Your Account | Content | Topics | Top 10  

Modules
· Home
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Feedback
· Forums
· Private Messages
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Statistics
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 10 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Random Headlines

National: Politics
[ National: Politics ]

·After 54 years should Malaysian Indians still keep nambikai (faith) in BN govern
·Motion urging government to draft an act on Race Relations
·Karpal: Up to DAP disciplinary committee to deal with Ramasamy issue
·For Malaysian Christians, an Anxious Holiday Season
·Rayer Challenges Ramasamy To Present Evidence
·Mr Khairy, know what you are talking.
·Mr. DPM. Please walk the talk.
·MP gets earful for comments to media
·Thiruttu karrupan made a senator

  
Sujatha Suicide: Samples Taken From Sujatha Missing - Doctors

Contributed by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 05 @ 08:24:11 CDT

MIC
KUALA LUMPUR, May 5 (Bernama) -- Missing samples. This was the highlight of the inquest into the death of local actress K. Sujatha as it entered its fourth day Tuesday.

Two doctors of the Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital testified that they could not confirm what actually happened to the samples taken from the actress.

First, Dr Vengkata Prathab said he ordered samples of blood, urine and gastric lavage to be taken from the actress on the first day she was warded at the hospital's emergency ward on June 19, 2007.


"I had ordered these samples to be taken immediately after she arrived at the emergency ward. However, doctors who treated her at the normal ward did not receive the report on the tests," he said.

Dr Prathab agreed with Deputy Public Prosecutor Anselm Charles Fernandis who was assisting coroner Mohd Fauzi Che Abu that the results of the samples were very crucial to conclude conclusively that the patient died due to poisoning.

Dr Prathab did not stop there.

He told the coroner that personally, he had a bad experience when samples taken from his mother were also reported missing.

He said that although such cases occured occasionally, doctors should not be singled out for blame as it involved several departments of the hospital.

"In Sujatha's case, other doctors and I focused more in giving emergency treatment to the patient," explained Dr Prathab.

He was testifying at the inquest into the death of Sujatha, 28, who died at the hospital in Klang on June 25, 2007, four days after admission for allegedly drinking weedkiller.

The episode of missing samples did not end there.

Medical officer Dr Lim Ai Wei testified that she had taken urine samples of Sujatha, the following day, to check for traces of paraquat.

"When I failed to receive the result, the following day, I personally went to the lab (laboratory) to check what had happened. But staff at the lab claimed that they did not receive the sample from the ward where Sujatha was treated," she explained.

The testimony from both doctors resulted in a heated exchange between Fernandis and counsel Datuk K. Kumaraendran representing Maika Holdings Bhd chief executive officer Vell Paari when Kumaraendran said it was not proper blaming doctors for the missing samples.

Fernandis said he was not blaming the doctors but just only stressed a point to the coroner that in medico-legal cases like Sujatha's, the issue of missing samples should not be taken lightly.

In reply, Kumaraendran said the inquest was not the right forum to bring up the issue, adding that the matter should be addressed to the health ministry.

Earlier, Sujatha's youngest brother told the Coroner's Court that he and his older brother requested doctors not to conduct a post-mortem on their sister's body.

Surenthiran, 26, said since the cause of her death was clearly stated as paraquat poisoning in the death certificate, they had wanted to stop her body from being cut into pieces during the post-mortem.

The systems engineer with Maika Intellectual Resources, a subsidary of Maika Holdings Bhd, said he had also sought the assistance of Dr S. P. Sakthiveloo who is attached to the hospital, in claiming the body.

To a question by Deputy Public Prosecutor Geethan Ram Vincent who is also assisting the coroner, as to why he allowed Paari to issue a press statement to say that Sujatha died due to an ovarian cyst, Surenthiran said it was his family's request.

"My family wanted Paari to issue the statement, mainly to protect my sister's dignity even though we are aware that the statement was not accurate and false," he said.

He also told the coroner that he did not suspect foul play in his sister's death or a possibility that she had committed suicide.

"I was very close to her and she had not related to me any personal problem...a few months before she passed away, she had, on occasions, complained of stomach pains," he said.

To another question by Geethan, Surenthiran said Paari paid for his studies in Australia.

The hearing continues tomorrow.



-- BERNAMA

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about MIC
· News by sound


Most read story about MIC:
Foul play in Malaysian actress death


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


Google
 
Disclaimer: The views expressed by the authors and comments on this website are the sole responsibility of the writers themselves. The writer will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The accuracy, completeness, honesty, exactitude and factuality of the articles and comments are not guaranteed by iMOL.

If you do not wish any of your writing republished here, please send mail to sound20[at]gmail.com. Allow us one month to remove it. Thanks. Copyright 1998 iMOL

Page Generation: 0.30 Seconds